By Imraan Khan, 10 August 2017
However, manager selection forms only a small part of the process. At a broader level, portfolio construction should be about structuring your portfolio in a way that stands the best chance of meeting your stated investment aims within your acceptable level of risk. (Vanguard, 2014, p.3).
Planning your investments with a financial adviser, rather than taking an ad hoc approach, has the potential to help you more closely reach your investment objectives. The following essay will introduce you to the basics of constructing a portfolio and selecting funds and fund managers. This understanding will help you to work with your financial adviser to construct a portfolio with the best chance of meeting your investment objectives. (Vanguard, 2014, p.3).
The investment process is as follows:
There are many different processes and approaches to constructing a portfolio of unit trust funds. Some approaches follow the process of first screening the unit trust universe with the aim of eliminating factors and others create financial models to identify appropriate asset allocation, with regard to the client’s unique investment needs and objectives. The following investment process will address a much simpler way of selecting unit trust funds (fund manager selection) for inclusion in an investment portfolio.
The first critical step, which is often the first step in most approaches, is to determine and understand one’s risk objective and risk profile. This process basically determines the level of risky assets to hold in a portfolio (asset allocation), and addresses one’s individual circumstances which inform the formulation of investment goals and objectives.
Step two involves the understanding of ASISA fund categories and classification which will help you understand the different types of funds available, where they are allowed to invest, what they are allowed to invest in as well as their respective risk classification. This understanding will help you to determine and identify which funds best suit your risk appetite and return objectives, given your investment time horizon. The understanding of the fund categories and risk classification will help you formulate your long-term strategic asset allocation. For example, there are two main types of collective investment scheme (CIS) portfolios - namely multi-asset funds and building-block funds or single asset class funds. Each of these funds have their own risk profiles, some being more aggressive and volatile over shorter time periods than others. The strategic asset allocation serves to achieve a portfolio’s objectives over the investment time horizon and is the percentage that should be invested in the various asset classes to realise long-term returns.
Step three involves the researching and selecting of fund managers with the emphasis on understanding their fund’s objectives and investment philosophies.
The fourth step involves portfolio construction and the blending of complementary funds. The second last step involves the understanding of costs associated with a portfolio, and the final step in the investment process is monitoring and rebalancing the portfolio.
Defining one's risk profile comprises three components:
"Your personal risk profile shows how ready you are to potentially lose money in return for the prospect of rewards. Your profile depends on your attitude to risk and your reason for investing. It also depends on your financial situation and how long you have to invest" (Vanguard, 2014, p.4). Matching the risk profile to the risk characteristics of a portfolio is one of the most important steps in constructing an investment portfolio. Glacier divides the client risk spectrum into five bands, namely Conservative, Cautious, Moderate, Moderately Aggressive, and Aggressive.
The recent changes to the ASISA classification system benefit retail investors by making it easier to understand and compare funds. The latest classification system divides funds according to domicile and types of underlying assets, allowing for the selection of appropriate funds specific to investment needs and to compare funds across and within categories. For example, multi-asset categories (previously asset allocation) invest in a broad range of underlying assets (i.e. shares, bonds, money markets, foreign and property) with mostly an equity exposure bias in sector names ( multi-asset high-equity funds),with the intention of reflecting different levels of risk. The classification system alone helps to eliminate the essential tactical asset allocation decisions. Therefore if you understand your risk-profile, you can select from one of the multi-asset categories which cater to investment appetites from conservative through to aggressive.
It's well known that if a manager has performed well in the past, it's not necessarily an indication that he or she will perform better than others in the future. According to ABSA Wealth, success generally leads to greater assets under management which means that a portfolio has reduced liquidity and flexibility because it owns a greater proportion of an underlying security's float (Lee.T.Romhilt.D.2013). Therefore the size of the manager's funds is not an aspect to ignore. The next step is to take a comprehensive view by following Robert Ludwig's 3P's. “Ludwig's Three P's” states that manager performance is an output and that initial manager evaluation should not focus on performance but on three critical input factors that result in performance output, namely:
There are a number of approaches or methods to constructing a portfolio. These include the traditional building-block approach, the multi-asset split funding approach and a hybrid strategy.
The approach that I will discuss is called the multi-asset and split-funding approach. By following this approach you will invest into multi-asset class funds based on your risk profile and long-term strategic asset allocation - evenly allocating among the selected funds (managers). The key benefit of this approach is that tactical asset allocation is done by the underlying fund managers, while the portfolio remains within the strategic asset allocation limits. Thus if you selected more than one multi-asset fund in your portfolio, you will receive the benefit of multiple tactical house views and not a single manager's tactical view.
Blending funds managed by different investment house/managers, who subscribe to different investment philosophies and processes, significantly increases the level of diversification within the portfolio and ultimately improves risk management. (Jakoet.I.2013.p1).
The key is to identify complementary funds and one good way of doing this is by comparing the past performance of the funds. This, however, does not guarantee that the funds will perform in a similar manner in the future. Another way of identifying complementary funds is to use a useful measure called the correlation coefficient. The correlation coefficient is a statistical measure which measures how two things behave (or move) relative to each other. A correlation coefficient of +1 indicates that two funds move together perfectly and -1 indicates an opposite movement relative to one another.
Managers that prescribe to different investment styles tend to have lower correlation numbers or even negative correlation numbers. Lowly correlated funds will be better suited for blending purposes within a portfolio.
If the correct funds and managers have been selected for inclusion in a portfolio, then - over time - a well-blended portfolio should display lower levels of volatility than a single fund and would typically protect capital better over time, resulting in a smoother performance profile.
The fund fees are found on the individual fund fact sheets as total investment charge (TIC). The fund fees typically accrue in the price of the fund and therefore are reflected in the market value of the portfolio. As a result, fees can have an effect on portfolio returns and investment objectives. Thus ensure the cost is worth the return.
Regular monitoring of changes made by the selected fund managers is required to ensure that the changes made don't affect investment objectives and fees charged.
It is important to ensure that as your life changes, your risk profile and investment objectives are still in line with your investment strategy.
Portfolio construction can be a complex task to implement and monitor over time. As you now have a greater understanding of portfolio construction and how it works, you can work with your adviser to put together a mix of assets that may ultimately help you to reach your investment goals. It is best practice to seek advice and guidance from a professional financial adviser to help you manage and grow your investments.
A qualified financial adviser can help you set your initial objectives and determine your risk profile. He or she can also assist in explaining the complex market information and signals, as well as provide up-to-date information regarding changes in market factors and legislation in the industry.
Hutchinson, R. (2013 p.1). The art and science of fund management. Retrieved October 18, 2014, from www.investec.co.za/research-and-insights/newsletters/private-view-newsletter/latest/Private_View_Q4/the-art-and-science-of-fund-manager-selection.html
Jakoet, I. (2013p.1). Reaping the benefits of blending unit trust funds. Retrieved October 18, 2014, from www.glacier.co.za/media-category/media-releases.
Lee.T.Romhilt.D. (2012.p.4.). Barclay’s art and science of manager selection. Retrieved October 19 from http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/audio/business/BarclaysFINAL.pdf.
Scott.D.Stewart.CFA.Boston. (2013). Manager selection. Retrieved via e-books cfa institute on the October 19 2014.
Vanguard .p.4. (2014). Investment risk, Balancing risk and potential rewards. Retrieved on the 21 October 2014 from www.vanguard.co.uk/documents/portal/literature/investment-risk-guide.pdf