23 October 2014
National Treasury recognises that a weak income growth environment poses a challenge to South Africa’s fiscal sustainability. It has lowered its expectations for GDP growth to an average 8.5 to 8.75 percent (current prices) per year for the next three years, from a previously forecast average of close to 9.5 percent. This implies Government’s gross loan debt ratio is expected to increase further than previously expected – specifically to 49.7 percent of GDP by 2016/17 (and 49.8 percent of GDP in 2017/18), compared with the previous estimate of 48.3 percent of GDP by 2016/17 published at the time the Budget was read in February this year.
To show the stabilisation of debt at even this higher level, Minister Nhlanhla Nene has needed to budget for a marked improvement in Government’s Main Budget deficit from -4.8 percent of GDP in 2014/15 to –3.0 percent of GDP in 2017/18. Meanwhile, the consolidated deficit is budgeted to decrease from -4.1 percent of GDP in 2014/15 to -2.5% of GDP in 2017/18.
Importantly, for the numbers to add up, the consolidated primary budget balance needs to improve from a deficit of 0.9 percent of GDP in 2014/15 to a surplus of 0.8 percent of GDP by 2017/18. What that means is that excluding Government’s interest payments on its debt, Minister Nene eventually intends spending less than Government’s revenue.
To achieve the expected improvement in the deficit, National Treasury has needed to cut government spending outright in the coming fiscal years relative to previous budget estimates, and increase taxes.
Specifically, spending is cut by R10 billion in 2015/16 and R15 billion in 2016/17 relative to Government’s previous projections. At the same time, as regards tax increases, there is no detail in the Medium-Term Budget other than the indication that changes to tax policy and administration (an improvement in tax efficiency) are expected to raise ‘at least’ R12bn in 2015/16, R15bn in 2016/17 and R17bn in 2017/18, while enhancing ‘the progressive nature of the tax system’. This suggests a focus on taxing higher income earners.
Over time, unless the structure of the economy changes or the tax regime is altered, government tax revenue should grow in line with GDP in current prices. This Budget implies that tax revenue, which has been increasing 1.3 times nominal GDP in recent fiscal years, can be expected to continue advancing faster than total GDP. That’s not growth enhancing. And, with GDP increasing just 6.4 percent (current prices) in the year to 2Q14 the economy needs to accelerate significantly to meet even the revised GDP forecasts.
It is the expenditure cuts that are likely to attract most interest, however. First, they were unexpected. And second, they are backed by clear guidelines as to how Government intends to rein in spending. The main focus of Government’s effort here is the government wage bill. To start, government personnel headcounts are to be frozen, while Treasury has planned its Budget ‘on the neutral assumption that cost-of-living adjustments will track consumer price index (CPI) projections’ of 5.9 percent, 5.6 percent and 5.4 percent in 2015, 2016 and 2017 respectively.
Treasury also warns that should public sector wages significantly outpace inflation, Government will be forced to cut services (either social spending or capital expenditure) or cut government jobs. In addition, Treasury intends to freeze budgets for ‘non-essential goods and services’, including travel allowances, advertising, spending on consultants and catering – although these amounts are relatively small in the grand scheme of things. Overall, the impact of these measures are reflected in the weak government consumption expenditure forecasts of Treasury, as real government consumption is expected to advance, on average, by just 1.5 percent per year from 2015 to 2017.
In tandem, Treasury notes, the increased taxes and proposed expenditure cuts are expected to improve the fiscal position by R22bn in 2015/16 and R30bn in 2016/17.
The rest of the fiscal package includes strengthening the budgeting process by focusing on long-term sustainability ‘within a fiscal framework that links aggregate expenditure and economic growth beyond the medium term’. Also, a ‘deficit neutral’ approach is to be adopted to financing state-owned companies. For example, the Medium Term Budget includes government funding of R20bn for Eskom, which is to be financed by the sale of non-strategic assets, in a ‘deficit neutral’ manner, while Eskom is to borrow R250bn over the next five years, supported by government guarantees.
All in all, South Africa’s weak economic performance has enforced material consolidation of fiscal policy. In the absence of the expected expenditure cuts and tax raising measures announced, Treasury would have needed to show an increase in Government’s gross government debt level to significantly above 50 percent of GDP - a historically high level. In drawing the line on continued fiscal slippage the Medium Term Budget, while recognising the constraints imposed on it in a weak economic environment, provides detail on how it intends to rein in spending. Now we need income growth to accelerate as forecast.