Regulation
While Dunne disagrees the burden of regulation represents a particular challenge for smaller firms, he dislikes the increased involvement of politicians on issues such as bonuses.
“Asset managers are not bankers, it is a completely different space, but it looks like they are trying to apply the same rules to us.”
Two specific regulatory issues he highlighted are the changes to UCITS rules and the Consumer Panel’s proposals for a single retail fund charge. Under new UCITS V proposals due to come into force in 2016, fund managers must take half of any bonus payments in units of their own funds. Dunne said fund managers at FOUR do hold allocations to their own funds, but that the proposed rules are too prescriptive.
“This seems a political move in many aspects,” he said. “Funds are not governed by limiting a manager’s salary or making them invest in their own fund. It can also be unfair on the manager, if it is a young person managing a cash fund, for example. It is very prescriptive, and trying to protect against a risk that does not exist.”
He is similarly doubtful about the Consumer Panel’s proposals on fund charges. This would see myriad fund costs replaced with a single investment management charge representing the cost charged to the end investor.
“We are big fans of transparency, but putting a single price on one fund is taking things too far. People could stop trading in order to avoid generating fees. There is nothing to stop people being told how much a fund has spent on dealing at the end of month, but it is very difficult to come up with a single price ahead of time.”
However, like many asset managers, Dunne can see opportunities presented by the changes to pension legislation which will come into force next April. This will see retirees no longer all-but forced to buy an annuity, but able to consider other options instead – such as income funds. It is in this space where Dunne thinks FOUR can benefit.